Smoke part 2: smoking bulbs

_OHL3876-Edit-WebsiteHaving sorted the general lighting and approach to shooting some smoke, here’s the next phase in my smoke project – tungsten bulbs.   The tungsten filaments in these bulbs can glow white hot and not just burn up because the bulb is filled with an inert gas, such as Argon, Krypton or Xenon.  The so-called “noble gases”do not interact with incandescent material, and so the filament can carry on glowing at near melting point for thousands of hours.  If you turn it on in regular air however….

Continue reading »

Posted in Equipment, How Its made, Lighting

Smoke

_OHL1632-with-pad-2

There are some photo ideas that have been done so much that I will probably never do them, unless I think I can build on them to produce something a little bit different.   This one has been on my photographic to-do list for some time, and I’m not done with it just yet, however I thought I’d share the journey so far.

Continue reading »

Posted in Equipment, How Its made, Lighting

LIGHTS, CAMERA, ER.. FOG! ACTION!

_DSC2534-Edit-Purple-PortEmilia Gaza contacted me recently to ask if I’d be interested in shooting some dance/burlesque with her.  Her portfolio notes over on PurplePort are filled with such enthusiasm and passion for dance and to create images of it I immediately said yes! Continue reading »

Posted in Equipment, How Its made, Lighting, Model Shoots

Aperture Controls Flash

I started to write this one up as the next “photography myths” post and had planned some demo shots, however Neil Van Niekerk explained it all brilliantly on his blog here: Tangents back in 2009.   Go there now and read it!  Neil’s blog is full of great articles on using flash, and a whole boatload of other photographic technique.   Here’s the summary I wrote to introduce my post:-

 

The next “myth and misdirection” you will come across as a photographer learning how to use flash, especially with natural/ambient light is this phrase:-

“Shutter speed controls ambient, aperture controls flash”

Whilst you can’t deny that both of those statements are true, since when did ambient/natural light become immune to the effects of your aperture size just because you start using flash?

For manual controlled flash power within normal x-sync range of shutter speeds:-

  • Shutter speed controls ambient light
  • Aperture controls flash and ambient light
  • ISO controls flash and ambient light
  • The flash power adjustment buttons on your light, control…. flash!

For TTL automatic flash exposure systems (camera on manual, flash on TTL ) the flash exposure is constant, as long as it is within the bounds of the flash gun to supply enough light, and the camera and subject remain reasonably still in relation to each other.  Close down the aperture?  The flash puts out more light so the flash exposure is the same.  Raise the ISO?  The flashgun reduces the power so the flash exposure remains the same.  Move the light?  The flashgun adjusts and the flash exposure remains constant.  The ambient light doesn’t react to these changes in shutter speed and aperture though, so ambient light exposure continues to change as before.  Stop down the aperture?  The ambient light exposure reduces – flash exposure stays the same.

 

 

Posted in How Its made, Lighting, Photography Myths

“Longer lenses compress the scene”

Seriously.  Stop saying this.   It’s no wonder newcomers to photography get confused when so much of the “received wisdom” they hear is just not true.  Alongside “aperture controls flash, shutter speed controls ambient” this is one of the most ubiquitous fallacies still being trotted out from a variety of sources.  The converse is also untrue:  wide angle lenses do not distort (at least not because of the focal length, they may of course have defects in their design and manufacture).

“But” I hear you say “if I take a picture of someone with a wide angle, their features look all distorted, they have a big nose and their entire head looks like a football!  If I use a telephoto lens, they look much more natural.”

Well, before I tell you what’s really going on, here’s two images of my friend Gary, who bravely volunteered to have his ruggedly handsome features pulled around for the sake of science:-
_OHL8864 _OHL8865-2
200mm 35mm

Continue reading »

Posted in How Its made, Photography Myths Tagged , , , , |

White Background Head Shots

091915_0034_WhiteBackgr1.jpg

Here’s a selection of corp head-shots I’ve done:-
http://owenlloydphotography.com/?page_id=2033

…and here’s how I do em:-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Equipment, How Its made, Lighting

No wide angle? No problem!

My travel lens solution for my Nikon D810 is the Nikon 28-300mm super-zoom.   This enables me to walk around, without a bag full of lenses, that can get stolen.  It also means I can capture things on the go when changing lenses, would mean the moment is lost, or you just end up annoying your family while they wait for you to faff around in the bag.  I carry the camera on a Black Rapid strap:   it sits on my right hip, ready to go if something interesting should appear  (lens cap off, lens hood on).

The only downside to this is that, well, 28mm aint that wide.  I can sometimes persuade my wife to carry my little Nikon 20mm f/2.8 AIS in here shoulder bag, ad have tried carrying it in my pockets before.  The problem with this arrangement though, is if you swap out the 28-300mm for the 20mm, you now have a large 2 pound lens to carry around – which doesn’t really fit in your pocket.  I sometimes hide the $1300 lens and come back for it, but this is far from ideal – even in remote locations where there’s no one around to walk off with it.

However, there is a modern day solution.  On the odd occasion I need something wider than 28mm, I just make a wide angle pano, and stitch it in Photoshop.  Here’s an example: for some reason, the ancient walled city of Dubrovnik has more than it;s fair share of basketball courts – just staring back atcha from the stone walls, gleaming limestone pavements and elegant towers.  I couldn’t fit this into 28mm – not by a long way, so I took 2 shots at 28mm and gave them to Photoshop.  Clicked all the boxes apart from the content aware fill of edges (the content in this case was too complex) and we get the result at the bottom.  Not bad.  Note – Lightroom is, as yet unable to do this correctly.  It has a go, but there’s a definite seam every time, as it can’t deal with the wildly different angles.

 _OHL9565  _OHL9566

_OHL9565-Edit

 

To do this from Lightroom couldn’t be simpler.  Adjust one image, sync these settings to the other one, select both images, right-click and select “Edit in.. | Merge to panorama in Photoshop”.  Leave everything on auto and check all the boxes except content aware fill.  Only check this one if the edges of the frame are simple (sky, water, grass etc).  Click go, flatten the image, save and close.  Your stitched panorama will appear back in Lightroom.

Posted in Equipment, How Its made

Shooting Air Shows

I’ve gone to the air show at RAF Cosford for the last 3 years and whilst I’m by no means a dedicated aircraft shooter, I thought I’d share some of the things I’ve learnt in that time.

Storm Chaser _OHL6374 _OHL7441

Continue reading »

Posted in How Its made, News

Macro – some results

_OHL6749

Using the setup I described in the last post  (sigma 105mm macro on 3 extension tubes with electrical connection pass-through.  Lighting from one on-camera SB900 with Rogue Flashbender XL II softbox), I captured a few insect shots including this one of two ants farming some aphids on a foxglove.  The ants stroke the aphids to encourage them to release a sweet liquid commonly referred to as “honeydew”.   They defend them from predators (ladybirds mostly) and even carry them to greener pastures when the food is exhausted.  Getting the head in focus took probably about 15 shots on a stepladder.  All the light here is from the flash, firing on TTL at –0.3 EV. Continue reading »

Posted in Equipment, How Its made, Lighting

ISO: does it really matter?

I watched Tony Northrup’s video on how to interpret the test scores on DxOMark (click here to watch this).   Tony and Chelsea’s videos are always well researched and I recommend them as a source of objective information.  Moreover – Tony takes a scientific approach to the research.   What does this mean?  Well, science is all about fact and evidence, and if you find evidence that contravenes your hypothesis, you need a new, or least modified hypothesis.  Tony does this – if he finds evidence that what he thought before was wrong, he changes what he says.     Not everybody can grasp this as can be seen in the comments below his videos 😛

In this video he observed from DxO’s test charts that especially for the sensors in Nikon bodies, there was almost a 1:1 trade off in dynamic range for every stop you gained in sensitivity – so in theory, you were not really gaining anything.  E.g., if you shoot at ISO 100, and then same thing again at ISO 200, you gained a stop of exposure, but lost a stop of dynamic range.  The extra dynamic range in the ISO 100 shot, allows you to bring it up a stop in post to match the exposure of the ISO 200 shot, with pretty much the same results.

I have a bunch of Nikon bodies so I thought I’d test this.  I used my D810 for these test shots.  I took 3 shots in manual exposure.  One at 1/320th of a second, f/8 and ISO 3200.  Then I took the same shot but at ISO 100, and added 5 stop of exposure to it in Lightroom.  As a reference I then kept it at ISO 100 and dialled in 5 stops of exposure time to get a clean shot at 1/10th of a second, f/8 and ISO 100.  Here they are:-

_OHL66031-320 sec at f - 8.0 ISO 3200_OHL66041-320 sec at f - 8.0 ISO 100_OHL66051-10 sec at f - 8.0 ISO 100

Continue reading »

Posted in Equipment, Lighting, News, Photography Myths